• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
No Brainer Data

No Brainer Data

Using data for making the best decisions is a no brainer

  • About
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact

The Demographic Tragedy of Ukraine: A Second Holodomor?

June 17, 2022 by Jose Miguel Guzman 3 Comments

The Demographic Tragedy of Ukraine: A Second Holodomor?[1]

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine may be sealing the tragic fate of a country’s demographic. Although it is unknown how this war will evolve or when and how it will end, it is already substantially impacting the population of Ukraine, in part because of Russian ambitions to seize part of Ukrainian territory. History has demonstrated that the demographic effects of a war will not only be significant during the war itself but will continue to be impactful for decades into the future. This war could be especially demographically devastating for Ukraine due to the pre-war situation: Ukraine was already experiencing a declining population, low fertility, and low life expectancy compared to its European neighbors. Although the demographic effects of this war extend beyond Ukraine’s frontiers, this article seeks to roughly quantify the effects to date as well as the potential demographic effects of this war for Ukraine.

It would be naïve to consider the demographic situation and trends as main factors defining Russia’s interest in invading Ukraine, particularly considering President Vladimir Putin’s ambitions, the complexities of historic Russia-Ukraine relations, the pre-war political situation of Ukraine, and the geopolitical role of Ukraine as a main actor in the global food supply chain, among other considerations. Accordingly, discussing the demographic survival of the country could appear irrelevant in light of ongoing events: a country being devastated by an unjustified invasion and millions of families, women, children, and older people leaving the country for survival, staying in shelters that are being bombarded without consideration, or attempting to live normally in the knowledge that nothing is secure. However, historical evidence indicates that demography has been highly relevant for Ukraine, particularly during the first half of the 20th century, when the country experienced successive “… demographic reversals almost unparalleled in modern history,”[2] including the 1932–1933 great famine, referred to as the Holodomor (death by starvation), when an estimated 4 to 5 million Ukrainians lost their lives. Had the country not experienced repeated catastrophes and emigration, the estimated size of the population in 1990 would have been 87.2 million rather than 51.6 million.[3] In a future reconstruction phase, the country will have to address an even more critical demographic situation and the effects of the massive humanitarian crisis that this invasion has created.

Russian demographic challenges as a factor of the war

From ranking fourth globally in 1950 in terms of population size, surpassed only by China, India, United States and the European Union (when considered as a whole minus Eastern Europe), Russia fell to fifth place in 1990 and ninth in 2020. It is estimated that by 2050, it will rank number 14, surpassed by 10 additional countries, all of which are developing or middle income: Nigeria, Pakistan, Indonesia, Brazil, Ethiopia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Bangladesh, Egypt, Mexico, and the Philippines. Russia has been affected by low birth rates and stagnant mortality rates. Demographically speaking, among superpowers Russia has become a dwarf country.

Putin’s statement that he perceives himself “as being on a historic mission to rebuild the Russian Empire”[4] indicates that demographic size and growth concerns may be among the president’s considerations. At his annual press conference in 2019, Putin asserted, “We are now haunted by this”[5][6] when referring to Russia’s low birth rates. Indeed, the Russian population has been declining or only growing slowly in the last 30 years, with a prospect of a sustained decline from now on. This decline is due not only to low fertility rates but also to the stagnant and even decreasing life expectancies experienced from 1960 to the beginning of the 21st century. Brent Peabody wrote recently on a foreign policy website that “Rather than being purely a limiting factor, it’s possible to argue Russia’s weak demographic hand has made it even more dangerous. After all, Russia’s need for more people is no doubt a motivating consideration for its current aggressive posture toward Ukraine.”[7] As Bruno Tertrais mentions in his article, written 10 days before the Russian invasion, the interest of Russia in Ukraine is rooted in “the underlying fear that Russia will be absorbed by Asia. A ‘demographic insecurity.’”[8]

Shrinking pre-war Ukraine population

Contrary to other middle-income and developed countries, Ukraine’s last traditional census occurred in 2001; in 2019, this country conducted an electronic census that most national researchers considered inadequate.[9] However, by combining data from different sources, demographers from Ukraine and abroad successfully identified some of the main characteristics of trends occurring after 1990.  From this analysis it is clear that, antecedent to the war, Ukraine was experiencing a debilitating demographic moment. The population of Ukraine has been shrinking since 1990, when it attained its maximum of 51.6 million inhabitants. By 2022, the United Nations (UN) estimated that the population of Ukraine would be 43,792,000, but the UN Population Division includes the population within the recognized boundaries of Ukraine (including the Crimea and Donbas regions). Using these data, it is estimated that between 1990 and 2022 Ukraine would have lost about 10.7 million people (more than 20% of its population), while Russia lost 1.3% of its population. However, if the population assessment of Ukraine conducted in 2019 by the Statistical Office[10] is accurate, the actual population size of Ukraine would be even smaller than the 43.8 million estimated by the United Nations: Only around 37.9 million. Accordingly, directly prior to the war, the demographic crisis of Ukraine caused by Russia’s annexation of Crimea, the occupation of the Donbas region, and emigration and low fertility, would have caused a decline of the population of his country of more than 26% between 1990 and 2022.

Apart from the annexations by Russia, this decline in Ukraine’s population was caused by low fertility rates, lower than those of Russia (In 2015–2020, the fertility rate in Ukraine was 1.4 children per woman compared to the Russian rate of 1.8 children per woman), and extremely low and even negative immigration rates from 1995–2005. Ukrainian fertility has been one of the lowest in the world, and there is no expectation that it will increase substantially,[11] even as the result of a post-war baby boom.[12]

In addition to its decreasing population, Ukraine was rendered further demographically vulnerable, even during the pre-war period, by its population’s sex and age structure. The country’s age structure is characterized by a small number of children and young people relative to the older generation, which implies that fewer women would be entering the reproductive age during the next few years. This factor would problematize the country’s demographic recuperation after the war, as even if women continue to have the same average number of children, fewer women in these ages means fewer births now and in the future; the result is a downward spiral of demographic decline. 

The graph of the population by age appears to present two different demographic profiles: one for people aged 40 years and above, born when the country had a fertility rate over the level of replacement (more than two children per woman), and another when fertility continued to decline and reached a rate of 1.2 children per woman by 2020.[13] The number of males aged 15–19 years is almost half the total number of males aged 35–39 years. Additionally, the county has a deficit of males, particularly after the age of 40 years, as can be seen in the figure above. The UN[14] estimates show that by 2020 there would be 23% more females than males aged 40–69 years.

Demographic impacts of war

The current population of Ukraine is now even more reduced, as all the elements that can create a demographic catastrophe are present: an excess of war-related deaths, extreme internal mobility, an increase in emigration (refugees), fewer births, and probable loss of territory. In one of the most accurate and complete studies of the possible demographic impacts of the war, conducted with funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020, Hill Kulu and collaborators[15] conclude that based on the impacts of war casualties and the assumption that only 10% of refugees return home after the war finishes,[16] the population of Ukraine could be reduced by either 24% or 33%, depending on whether the war is short or long. The effect will be felt particularly by the children and working-age populations. As the authors acknowledge, this calculation does not consider additional issues, such as increased mortality due to the long-term effects of the health crisis among the civil population resulting from injuries, infectious diseases, and other traumas augmented by the war.

The situation qualifies as a demographic tragedy for several reasons, the first of which is the loss of lives. Even before the war, Ukraine was not progressing in terms of its population’s life expectancy. While in Poland life expectancy increased by 7.3 years for women and 8.4 years for men between 1990 and 2020, these figures were, respectively, only 1.4 and 0.8 in Ukraine,[17] particularly due to the reduction in this indicator at the beginning of the 1990s and the effect of the coronavirus disease 2019 on the 2020 life expectancy. The war has exacted an unknown number of deaths in both the civil and military Ukrainian population as accurate data is not available. Numbers varies depending on the sources[18].

The second factor is the war’s impact on the spatial distribution of the population, which has been continuously and completely altered due to the ongoing massive internal population displacement. The International Organization for Migration estimates that over 7.1 million people, about 16% of the country’s population, have been internally displaced.[19] Although 4.5 million have returned to their place of origin, some could move again if the situation deteriorates. A detailed calculation of displacements between oblasts that was performed based on real-time Facebook penetration rates data combined with demographic data and geospatial methods estimated that by May 15, 2022, 6,842,151 people had been displaced from their baseline oblast.[20] The age structure of the population has been severely affected, with a high proportion of women of all ages and children and adolescents leaving their oblasts (refer to the graph depicting the situation of Kyiv).

Source: See Footnote 20

Third, a massive number of refugees are fleeing Ukraine to other countries, leaving behind their property, schools, jobs, and other family members. According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, which is the UN refugee agency, the number of refugees fleeing Ukraine since February 24, 2022 is estimated at 6.6 million.[21] The same agency estimates that during the same period, 2.1 million Ukrainians entered Ukraine, which can be considered a rough estimate of the number of Ukrainians who initially returned to their country once the situation improved in some areas. It is impossible to estimate how many of the refugees will return because this statistic will depend on many other factors, including how long the war lasts, its intensity in the refugees’ areas of residence, and the country’s situation when the war ends. The likelihood that Ukrainians will (or will be able to) return to their residences will be low in areas occupied by Russia, such as the Donbas region. The composition of the returning population will also influence the population’s sex and age structure and the prospect for an increase in population growth.

The fourth factor is the further reduction of fertility directly resulting from the consequences of the war and the possibility of birth rates continuing to decline due to a decrease in the number of women of reproductive age. Additionally, the future uncertainties created by the war may make the decision of having children even harder for women and couples in the future. Louis March asserts that “precious future generations will go unborn because of the slaughter.”[22]

The fifth element is the impact of a population structure with a high proportion of older persons. Even without quality data on the age structure of the refugee population that has left the country or the probable age structure of those who will eventually return to Ukraine, there is a high probability that as refugees are overrepresented by younger people and children, the new age structure of the country will contain fewer people of younger ages and relatively more older individuals. The resulting composition of the population will place greater pressure on the Ukrainian economy during the reconstruction process.

Sixth, the loss of territory due to Russian occupation will significantly impact Ukraine’s population. It is currently estimated that Russian forces occupy about 100,000 square kilometers, including Crimea, which equals around one-fifth of Ukraine’s territory.[23]

The short-term demographic effects of the war in Ukraine are already existent, and they are devastating for a country that was already weak in terms of its demographic profile. Although the long-term effects are unpredictable, the prospect of a continuing demographic tragedy will be difficult to avoid. However, this is not only a demographic tragedy; it is a human tragedy. While this war will likely not be a second Holodomor for Ukraine if measured by the number of deaths, its impact will probably be worse due to the effects of the war and the future expectation of having a such destructive power as a neighbor.

By conducting a merciless military intervention aimed at achieving, among other outcomes, its own demographic expansion, Russia may have desired to demonstrate, as a continuation of a war against Ukraine that started in 2014 with the Euromaidan,[24] the unviability (including demographically speaking) of Ukraine as a nation. Nevertheless, the war has come to demonstrate the opposite, as shown by the emergence of a national spirit and identity under the leadership of President Volodymyr Zelensky. It can be hoped that the demographic resilience of the country, which has been pushed to the limit by the Russian invasion and war, is reinforced and strengthened by this spirit and that new Ukrainian generations can build the future they deserve in a demographically flourishing country.

A more positive demographic outlook, needed for the economic recuperation and reconstruction of the country, should be based on a set of policies and actions which may include at least these three elements: a) a recuperation of fertility rates based on reinforcing gender equity and building family support, b) vast investments in health and mortality reduction and human capital, and c) an audacious immigration policy that will draw workers and families from other countries to fill the gaps in the population’s age and sex structure and bring and sustain the new labor supply structure, sufficient in numbers and skills, needed to rebuild the country. In its reconstruction as a resilient and stronger country, the contribution that demography can make to Ukraine will be an essential part of the solution.

Acknowledgements

The author wants to thank the following persons who contributed with comments and suggestions to this article: Mikhail Minakov, the Wilson Center Kennan Institute’s Senior Advisor on Ukraine and Editor-in-Chief of Focus Ukraine, which is Kennan Institute’s Ukraine-focused blog; Jaime Nadal Roig, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Country Representative for Ukraine; Ilona Sologoub, Scientific Editor of VoxUkraine; Andy Tatem, Founder and Director of WorldPop and Professor of Spatial Demography and Epidemiology at University of Southampton; Ritika Puri, COO and co-founder Storyhackers; and Mónica Villarreal, Co-founder of NoBrainerData.

  1. Unless stated differently, data used in this analysis comes primary from State Statistics Service of Ukraine. http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ Accessed on June 2, 2022)
  2. Romaniuk, A., & Gladun, O. (2015). Demographic Trends in Ukraine: Past, Present, and Future. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 315–337. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24639360
  3. Ibidem.
  4. Putin the Great? Russia’s President Likens Himself to Famous Czar. June 9, 2022 Anton Troianovski. New York Times. June 9, 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/09/world/europe/putin-peter-the-great.html
  5. Vladimir Putin’s annual news conference, 2019. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/62366 .
  6. See also https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/12/01/russia-population-decline-putin/
  7. Russia Doesn’t Have the Demographics for War: The 1990s collapse in birth rates still impacts Moscow’s ambitions.
    https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/01/03/russia-demography-birthrate-decline-ukraine/
  8. Why Ukraine Matters to Russia: The Demographic Factor. https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/blog/why-ukraine-matters-russia-demographic-factor Accessed on May 30, 2022.
  9. Ukraine’s census attempt crashes and burns yet again. Independent Ukraine has held only one census, almost 20 years ago. Mariya Chukhnova Aug 12, 2020. https://eurasianet.org/ukraines-census-attempt-crashes-and-burns-yet-again
  10. https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/nazvana-chislennost-naseleniya-ukrainy-1579768750.html
  11. Only 6 per cent of Ukrainians would be thinking in having one child in the near future (Michał Kozak. The Ukraine’s population is lower than previously believed 29.06.2020. https://www.obserwatorfinansowy.pl/autor/michal-kozak/
  12. “I’m not convinced of a sharp spike in post-war birthrates in Ukraine” said Ella Libanova, Director of the Ukrainian Institute of Demography and Social Sciences, when asked if we could expect a baby boom following the war. Interview with sociology professor on how the war will impact Ukraine’s demographics. Author: Ирина Крикуненко. https://english.nv.ua/nation/interview-with-sociology-professor-ella-libanova-on-war-s-effect-on-ukraine-s-demographics-ukraine-50248230.html
  13. Data from State Statistics Service of Ukraine shows that fertility did not show a steady decline during the period 1990-2020, having a first decline up to 2001, when total fertility rate was close to 1 child per woman, increases again to 1.5 observed between 2000 and 2008 and then decline again to 1.2 children per woman. It is possible that these oscitations are more ‘tempo’ effects than real changes in the final number of children women have.
  14. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World Population Prospects 2019, Online Edition. Rev. 1.
  15. Kulu, H., Christison, S., Liu, C., & Mikolai, J. (2022). The War and the Future of Ukraine’s Population. MigrantLife Working Paper 9. http://migrantlife.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/files/2022/03/The-War-and-the-Future-of-Ukraines-Population.pdf
    The number of women of reproductive age had already declined steadily from 12 million in 2008 to 8.8 million in 2021.
  16. This could probably happen only if the war situation deteriorates in such a way that people cannot return even if they want, as surveys shows that close to 80 % of refugees want to return after the war. Razumkov Center. Ukrainian refugees: attitudes and assessments (March 2022). https://razumkov.org.ua/napriamky/sotsiologichni-doslidzhennia/ukrainski-bizhentsi-nastroi-ta-otsinky?fbclid=IwAR0-vmzoi0oebP8E5z0dUQli4be9hqASb2KhvWYiwNjruTuxAfQxK9P7e48
  17. Based on estimates provided by the United Nations. United Nations. 2019 Revision of World Population Prospects. https://population.un.org/wpp/DataQuery/
  18. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights estimate that by June 3, the number of civilian casualties in the country include 4,183 killed and 5,014 injured. https://www.ohchr.org/en/news/2022/06/ukraine-civilian-casualty-update-3-june-2022
  19. Ukraine — Internal Displacement Report — General Population Survey Round 5 (17 May 2022- 23 May 2022) Accessed on April 30, 2022.
  20. Leasure DR, Kashyap R, Rampazzo F, Elbers B, Dooley CA, Weber I, Fatehkia M, Bondarenko M, Verhagen M, Frey A, Yan J, Akimova ET, Sorichetta A, Tatem AJ, Mills MC. 2022. Ukraine Crisis: Monitoring population displacement through social media activity, v3.0. Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science, University of Oxford; SocArXiv. 16 May 2022. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/6j9wq
  21. UNHCR Operational Data Portal. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine Accessed on May 24. Accessed on May, 2022.
  22. Ukraine’s other battle: demography. Mercatornet. by Louis T. March. Mar 17, 2022.
    https://mercatornet.com/ukraines-other-battle-demography/78094/
  23. How the map of Ukraine has changed in three months of war. El Pais. International. Accessed on May 30, 2022. https://english.elpais.com/international/2022-05-24/how-the-map-of-ukraine-has-changed-in-three-months-of-war.html
  24. See https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/explainers/understanding-ukraines-euromaidan-protests

Filed Under: Blog

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Kwabena Osei-Danquah says

    June 30, 2022 at 2:44 pm

    Brilliant and utterly fascinating analysis. Congrats Jose Miguel

    Reply
  2. Kummer Mihaly says

    April 23, 2023 at 5:23 pm

    Dear Sir. Dear Jose Miguel Guzman. I think it is time to dump all of your old text books. Your article / study is full with old and extremely stupid ideas. Ukraine 150 km from my home in Hungary, is in war now, and mortality-displacement was on, just as strongly as in Russia, and all other advanced economies. Mortality-displacement is when countries have high portion of residents over 55 years old … The whole point of my response is this, Ukraine with Russian assistance will eventually “kill” all of its over 55 population, and will gain the youngest -by far- population within Europe. The question is then rather this: Haw fast the west will capture its new demographic dividend… ????
    You may ask why ? Well, most of the world 140 million babies are produced by the shrinking percentage of earth human population of 8 billion. They are called fertile-women between the age of 20-30, today. They used to represent about 12 percent of the total population before the pills, now they are only about 6 or 5 percent- except Africa -… This not the result of the pill, rather the result of the financial system. That system created the illusion to you that you and I, and many more of us can have a meaningful life over 65 too. No it is false.. I am 63… But I see, that we create the next war, and the next after that… “War is young men dying and old men talking.” — Franklin D. Roosevelt..
    Well at times, old men are just imposing. Young men are blindly following, Stop being blind,… please.

    Reply
  3. VM says

    August 6, 2023 at 7:37 pm

    Soviet Ukraine was 52 million happy people. Current fascist Ukraine is 20 million desperately unhappy people, 10 million of them are old pensioners. Thank you, West, for democratization! Wish you the same!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search in Blog

Search by Tags

Climate Change Adaptation connectivity data data governance data monetization data sharing Demography Depopulation future of mobility Hulu mobility Mortality Population Decline transportation

Blog Contributors

Nikolai Botev

Visiting Scholar/Adjunct Faculty at the Institute of Demography and Department of Demography, HSE University, Moscow

Diana E. Páez

Diana E. Páez

Senior Director of Grants & Partnerships at the William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan (U-M)

Blog Contributors

Daniel Schensul

Humanitarian Data and Risk Specialist for UNFPA

Blog Contributors

Jacques Véron

Demographer and Emeritus Senior Researcher at INED

Terence Hull

Terence Hull

Emeritus Professor of Demography

Alexandre Sidorenko

Alexandre Sidorenko

Consultant on Policy and Programs on Aging

Silvia Giorguli

Silvia Giorguli

President of El Colegio de México

Nikolai Botev

Visiting Scholar/Adjunct Faculty at the Institute of Demography and Department of Demography, HSE University, Moscow

Nikolai Botev is a visiting scholar/adjunct faculty at the Institute of Demography and Department of Demography, HSE University, Moscow. He started his career as a researcher at the Higher Institute of Economics in Sofia, Bulgaria, before moving on to work for the United Nations. Until his recent retirement from UN, he worked for the Population Fund (UNFPA), where among other things he was Director of the UNFPA office for Central Asia. Prior to that he was with the UN Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), where he managed a data-collection and research project on population ageing, and coordinated a number of high level inter-governmental meetings. Nikolai Botev holds a Ph.D. in Demography from the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, USA). His professional and intellectual interests cover population and public policy (incl. the motivations, tools and outcomes of pronatalist policies), intermarriage and inter-group relations, population ageing and its social and economic implications, as well as historical demography and the theory of the demographic transition. He has published in journals like American Sociological Review, Population and Development Review, Population Studies, European Journal of Ageing, and has lectured in a number of academic institutions. Springer recently published his The Sexuality-Reproduction Nexus and the Three Demographic Transitions: An Integrative Framework (ISBN: 978-3-030-37555-3).

Diana E. Páez

Senior Director of Grants & Partnerships at the William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan (U-M)

Diana E. Páez is Senior Director of Grants & Partnerships at the William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan (U-M), an independent, non-profit research and educational organization working to help businesses thrive in low- and middle-income countries. In addition to leading the Institute’s business development efforts and overseeing grant-funded projects, Diana works to create value for businesses operating at the intersection of energy and mobility in emerging markets. Before joining WDI, she served as a Program Officer for the Higher Education for Development office of the American Council on Education in Washington, D.C.; a Program Manager for the National Democratic Institute; and a Public Sector Governance Consultant for The World Bank Institute. Proudly born and raised in Monterrey, Mexico, Diana has a JD in Law and Social Sciences from the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, a Master’s degree in Public International Law from Université de Paris II, Panthéon Assas, and a Master’s degree in Prospective for International Studies from Université de Paris V, René Descartes. More recently, she completed a Foundations of Mobility Certificate from the University of Michigan College of Engineering. A passionate of international development, cross-cultural perspectives, and the power of serendipity, Diana enjoys learning, traveling, reading, and writing.

Daniel Schensul

Humanitarian Data and Risk Specialist for UNFPA

Daniel Schensul is Humanitarian Data and Risk Specialist for UNFPA’s Humanitarian Office. In this role he supports humanitarian work in high risk and emergency contexts in assessing and addressing risk and improving data and targeting for humanitarian preparedness and response. In this and prior roles, he has conducted extensive research on climate change risk and adaptation, as well as disaster vulnerability, including in Indonesia, Malawi, Maldives and the Caribbean. He also worked on research and policy in support of intergovernmental agreements and commitments the world’s governments have made related to population change, sexual and reproductive health, gender equality, climate change, humanitarian response and other areas. Dr. Schensul is co-editor of two books and has authored multiple papers on population issues and climate change, and has published on urbanization, sustainable development and demography. He received his BA from Columbia University and his PhD from Brown University.

Jacques Véron

Demographer and Emeritus Senior Researcher at INED

Jacques Véron is a French demographer and emeritus senior researcher at INED. He has been head of International Affairs Department of INED ant then Deputy Director. He has been a member of the French delegation to the United Nations Population and Development Commission for more than ten years. His research focuses on the relationship between population, environment and development. He is also working on Indian population dynamics in collaboration with Indian demographers. He was member of the team of the first survey on international migrations from Punjab. He is now studying the impact of cyclones in the Odisha State. He has also a special interest on the history and the epistemology of demography. In addition to his articles, he has published a number of books: Démographie (1991), Arithmétique de l’Homme (1993), Population et développement (1994), Le Monde des femmes (1997), Leibniz et les raisonnements sur la vie humaine (2001), L’urbanisation du monde (2006). He has edited Ages, generations and the Social contract. The Demographic Challenges facing the Welfare State (2007) and is co-editor of the Handbook of Population and Environment to be published in 2020.

Terence Hull

Emeritus Professor of Demography

Terence (Terry) Hull is Emeritus Professor of Demography at The Australian National University. He was President of the Asian Population Association for the period 2013-2015 and from 2015-2018 serves on the APA Council as the Immediate Past President. Since 2001 he has been on the International Steering Committee of the Asia Pacific Conference on Reproductive and Sexual Health and Rights. Before retirement in 2013 he was Professor of Demography in the Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute (ADSRI — now the School of Demography) and Adjunct Professor of the National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health (NCEPH). In the latter position, he held the JC Caldwell Chair in Population, Health and Development. In his position as Emeritus Professor he is attached to the School of Demography in the Research School of Social Sciences, the College of Arts and Social Sciences. In 2015 Hull was made a Technical Advisor for the University of Melbourne’s Bloomberg Data for Health Initiative, a four-year project to improve civil registration and vital statistics in twenty countries. His focus will be on Indonesia, but he will also assist with training and program assessment.

Alexandre Sidorenko

Consultant on Policy and Programs on Aging

Dr. Alexandre Sidorenko is an international consultant on policy and programs on aging, including advisory services and training in Eastern European countries and countries of the former Soviet Union. His current assignments and duties: Member of the Societal Advisory Board of the EC Joint Program Initiative “More years, better lives”; Global Ambassador for HelpAge International (London, United Kingdom); International tutor, International Institute on Aging (UN-Malta); Member, Board of Trustees, World Demographic Association Forum Foundation (St. Gallen, Switzerland); Senior Advisor, European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research (Vienna, Austria). Previously, Alexandre Sidorenko was the Chief of the Population Unit, UN Economic Commission for Europe (2010); and Head of the United Nations Program on Aging (1988-2009). Dr. Sidorenko was born in St. Petersburg, Russia. He received his early education in Ukraine. Dr. Sidorenko pursued graduate studies in medicine, obtaining a Ph.D. in cellular immunology. He was a lecturer at the Kyiv Medical University from 1975 to 1978 and had ten years’ experience in experimental gerontology at the Kyiv Institute of Gerontology, spanning from 1978 to 1988.

Silvia Giorguli

President of El Colegio de México

Silvia Giorguli is the president of El Colegio de México and a faculty member of the Center for Demographic, Urban and Environmental Studies. Her research focuses on international migration from Mexico to the United States and its consequences on education, family formation, and family dynamics in both sides of the border and the transition to adulthood in Mexico and Latin America. She is co-researcher in the Mexican Migration Project. She received a PhD in Sociology from Brown University.

Other Articles

The Demographic Tragedy of Ukraine: A Second Holodomor?

The power of data to enable the future of mobility

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed rifts in intergenerational solidarity (which are driven partly by demographic change)

COVID-19 Data: What are we counting?

Footer

©2021 NoBrainerData. All rights reserved.

Explore

About Us
Blog

Services
Contact Us

Social Media

LinkedIn
Twitter

Facebook
Instagram