• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
No Brainer Data

No Brainer Data

Using data for making the best decisions is a no brainer

  • About
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact

How many people have lived in the World?

November 25, 2019 by Jose Miguel Guzman 1 Comment

Neither floods nor plagues, famines nor cataclysms, nor even the eternal wars of century upon century, have been able to subdue the persistent advantage of life over death. Gabriel García Márquez The Nobel Prize in Literature 1982, Discourse during the Award Ceremony.

A question that I had even before I decided to become a demographer was how many people had put their footprint before me in the places I was walking on? Sometime ago, a friend of mine asked me the question of how many people have been born on Earth since the beginning of our lives as homo-sapiens. I remembered how fascinated I was with the figure I got the first time. It was like: it is not possible! That occurred when Professor Nathan Keyfitz, from Canada, an incredible great professor, considered one of the best in mathematical demography, was teaching a group of Latin American demography students (I was part of that group) about some of the mathematical equations of population change. Sometime after that, I used Keyfitz figures and added the births occurred after the year of his estimate, and obtained the number of 76 billion.

However, more recently, my colleague Toshiko Kaneda, a senior research associate at Population Reference Bureau (PRB), provided the current estimates on how many people have lived on Earth based on an original version from Carl Haub, former senior demographer at PRB. Using more data than Prof. Keyfitz, Ms. Kaneda estimated that this number is actually much higher. She calculated that 108.5 billion people have existed in Earth since 50,000 years ago, a moment close to when Homo sapiens migrated from Africa and arrived to Eurasia. Obviously, Homo sapiens existed before and they were other advanced hominids as the Neanderthals before them. So, as the PRB recognizes, the figure could be a little higher than that but, given the challenge of defining a precise departing point, the landmark of 50,000 years seems like a good solution. As it is stated below, a large part of the number is related to the population growth of the last centuries.

The truth is that we, human beings living on Earth now, including you and myself, are the result of a complex, long-standing, amazing and terrible fight for survival. Human beings have gone through moments of glory and destruction, evolution and regression, fights against nature and more frequently than we would like, fight against others from the same or similar species; indeed a very long history of life and death. However, paraphrasing García Márquez, the fact that we exist is a demonstration that, at least up to now, life has overcome death. You and me, all of us, we must considered ourselves as an incredible illustration of universal luck.

It took a long time for the Homo sapiens to come to existence after life on Earth appeared about 4 billion years ago. Only about 4 million years ago the first bipedal apes came to existence. Homo sapiens developed about 200,000 years ago in Africa. It is considered that they arrived in Europe about 60,000 years ago. At that time, Neanderthals were already there. They were not so lucky and basically disappeared. However, their inbreeding with Homo sapiens left genetic traces in a portion of the world population, including on me. Other hominids also disappeared as the fantastic Hobbits that inhabited the Island of Flores in Indonesia. They disappeared like many other hominids branches.

What has been the evolution of the world population in the last 50,000 years? PRB uses for the last 10,000 years the estimates produced by some scholars and United Nations and summarized by the US Census Bureau. With the exception of the recent past, these are based on limited data available and many assumptions, so they are less and less reliable as we go further into the past and become completely non-existent before the development of agriculture 12000 years ago. It would be amazing if we had enough data about our ancestors for the past 50,000 years. The possibility of using more sophisticated data, modeling and techniques is not an easily attainable task. An enormous financial effort to support more archaeology and genetic research could help. But even if this happens, we would be getting only some points in time that can shed light on how we have evolved but could not provide a good account of population numbers. We may have to live with the idea that, at least numerically, we can have some estimates for the past 10,000 years, with some degree of confidence for the last 200 years, but not earlier than that.

The estimates mentioned above plus those produced by the United Nations for the period between 1950 and now show the amazing evolution of the total population (see graph below). One can appreciate the explosion of population growth that occurred, particularly in the last century. It took the whole history of human beings to reach the first billion. It was about the year 1800. And about 200 years later, we are 8 billion of people, all of us living on Earth, except the six astronauts that are now in the International Space Station. Actually, it was only after 1800 that the rate of population growth started increasing over 0.5 %, a rate that allows a population to double in 140 years. Before 1800, the average population growth rate from the date we have some data (10,000 BC) and 1800, was less than 0.1 %, a rate that requires a period of about 700 years to allow for a duplication of the population. Let’s say you start with a population of 100 million with an annual increase rate of 0.1 %; it will take you more than 9,000 years to reach the first billion.

When we think about the figure of 108.5 billion of births, it seems like a lot. However, because of the demographic revolution in the last century, one out of ten (10.4%) of all births ever occurred in Earth took place in the last 100 years! Isn’t that amazing? We, survivors of this last 100 years generation, have lived during the period of humanity with the higher population and economic growth and also the period with greater innovation and scientific breakthrough. Unfortunately, as it is well known, it has been also the period of major environmental destruction. About 94% of all CO2 produced in the last five hundred years, around the start of Industrial Revolution, has been produced in the last century and about 50 % in the last 25 years. The continuity of human existence, and our numeric existence, is related to how we evolve as human beings from now on.

Before ending this post, I would like to share with you what I was thinking this morning before finishing this post. I saw that the probability to win the Power Ball jackpot (an US lottery) is 1 in 292,200,000 million. Doesn’t it seem almost impossible to be so lucky and get all that money? Well, the probability of each one of us of being born in Earth is 1 in 108,470,000,000, a really very low probability. If you are reading this is because you are one of us, the surviving legacy of the generation of births of the last 100-120 years. Even better, as Adam Rutherford says in his book A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived, your genetic fingerprint is yours alone.

So, you and me, we are really a very lucky product of the universe. Our most precious resource is not time. It is luck. The luck to have been born, the luck to be among the human beings having ever existed in this little and beautiful blue planet hidden in one extreme of the Milky Way. Be thankful and responsible for this luck but at the same time be humble about our uniqueness. Rutherford says that we are only as unique as any other species. And I would add that probably the main difference we have with other species is that we are the only ones capable of producing systems for storing and using data about ourselves. This is our gift.

Disclaimer
Any views or opinions presented in this blog are personal and belong solely to the blog owner and they do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the contributors of this blog nor of any institutions, firms or organizations in which  the author currently works or have worked in the past. All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only.

Filed Under: Data, Blog

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Paul Ametepi says

    December 6, 2019 at 1:00 pm

    Interesting read!!! Looking forward to more posts!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search in Blog

Search by Tags

Climate Change Adaptation connectivity data data governance data monetization data sharing Demography Depopulation future of mobility Hulu mobility Mortality Population Decline transportation

Blog Contributors

Nikolai Botev

Visiting Scholar/Adjunct Faculty at the Institute of Demography and Department of Demography, HSE University, Moscow

Diana E. Páez

Diana E. Páez

Senior Director of Grants & Partnerships at the William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan (U-M)

Blog Contributors

Daniel Schensul

Humanitarian Data and Risk Specialist for UNFPA

Blog Contributors

Jacques Véron

Demographer and Emeritus Senior Researcher at INED

Terence Hull

Terence Hull

Emeritus Professor of Demography

Alexandre Sidorenko

Alexandre Sidorenko

Consultant on Policy and Programs on Aging

Silvia Giorguli

Silvia Giorguli

President of El Colegio de México

Nikolai Botev

Visiting Scholar/Adjunct Faculty at the Institute of Demography and Department of Demography, HSE University, Moscow

Nikolai Botev is a visiting scholar/adjunct faculty at the Institute of Demography and Department of Demography, HSE University, Moscow. He started his career as a researcher at the Higher Institute of Economics in Sofia, Bulgaria, before moving on to work for the United Nations. Until his recent retirement from UN, he worked for the Population Fund (UNFPA), where among other things he was Director of the UNFPA office for Central Asia. Prior to that he was with the UN Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), where he managed a data-collection and research project on population ageing, and coordinated a number of high level inter-governmental meetings. Nikolai Botev holds a Ph.D. in Demography from the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, USA). His professional and intellectual interests cover population and public policy (incl. the motivations, tools and outcomes of pronatalist policies), intermarriage and inter-group relations, population ageing and its social and economic implications, as well as historical demography and the theory of the demographic transition. He has published in journals like American Sociological Review, Population and Development Review, Population Studies, European Journal of Ageing, and has lectured in a number of academic institutions. Springer recently published his The Sexuality-Reproduction Nexus and the Three Demographic Transitions: An Integrative Framework (ISBN: 978-3-030-37555-3).

Diana E. Páez

Senior Director of Grants & Partnerships at the William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan (U-M)

Diana E. Páez is Senior Director of Grants & Partnerships at the William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan (U-M), an independent, non-profit research and educational organization working to help businesses thrive in low- and middle-income countries. In addition to leading the Institute’s business development efforts and overseeing grant-funded projects, Diana works to create value for businesses operating at the intersection of energy and mobility in emerging markets. Before joining WDI, she served as a Program Officer for the Higher Education for Development office of the American Council on Education in Washington, D.C.; a Program Manager for the National Democratic Institute; and a Public Sector Governance Consultant for The World Bank Institute. Proudly born and raised in Monterrey, Mexico, Diana has a JD in Law and Social Sciences from the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, a Master’s degree in Public International Law from Université de Paris II, Panthéon Assas, and a Master’s degree in Prospective for International Studies from Université de Paris V, René Descartes. More recently, she completed a Foundations of Mobility Certificate from the University of Michigan College of Engineering. A passionate of international development, cross-cultural perspectives, and the power of serendipity, Diana enjoys learning, traveling, reading, and writing.

Daniel Schensul

Humanitarian Data and Risk Specialist for UNFPA

Daniel Schensul is Humanitarian Data and Risk Specialist for UNFPA’s Humanitarian Office. In this role he supports humanitarian work in high risk and emergency contexts in assessing and addressing risk and improving data and targeting for humanitarian preparedness and response. In this and prior roles, he has conducted extensive research on climate change risk and adaptation, as well as disaster vulnerability, including in Indonesia, Malawi, Maldives and the Caribbean. He also worked on research and policy in support of intergovernmental agreements and commitments the world’s governments have made related to population change, sexual and reproductive health, gender equality, climate change, humanitarian response and other areas. Dr. Schensul is co-editor of two books and has authored multiple papers on population issues and climate change, and has published on urbanization, sustainable development and demography. He received his BA from Columbia University and his PhD from Brown University.

Jacques Véron

Demographer and Emeritus Senior Researcher at INED

Jacques Véron is a French demographer and emeritus senior researcher at INED. He has been head of International Affairs Department of INED ant then Deputy Director. He has been a member of the French delegation to the United Nations Population and Development Commission for more than ten years. His research focuses on the relationship between population, environment and development. He is also working on Indian population dynamics in collaboration with Indian demographers. He was member of the team of the first survey on international migrations from Punjab. He is now studying the impact of cyclones in the Odisha State. He has also a special interest on the history and the epistemology of demography. In addition to his articles, he has published a number of books: Démographie (1991), Arithmétique de l’Homme (1993), Population et développement (1994), Le Monde des femmes (1997), Leibniz et les raisonnements sur la vie humaine (2001), L’urbanisation du monde (2006). He has edited Ages, generations and the Social contract. The Demographic Challenges facing the Welfare State (2007) and is co-editor of the Handbook of Population and Environment to be published in 2020.

Terence Hull

Emeritus Professor of Demography

Terence (Terry) Hull is Emeritus Professor of Demography at The Australian National University. He was President of the Asian Population Association for the period 2013-2015 and from 2015-2018 serves on the APA Council as the Immediate Past President. Since 2001 he has been on the International Steering Committee of the Asia Pacific Conference on Reproductive and Sexual Health and Rights. Before retirement in 2013 he was Professor of Demography in the Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute (ADSRI — now the School of Demography) and Adjunct Professor of the National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health (NCEPH). In the latter position, he held the JC Caldwell Chair in Population, Health and Development. In his position as Emeritus Professor he is attached to the School of Demography in the Research School of Social Sciences, the College of Arts and Social Sciences. In 2015 Hull was made a Technical Advisor for the University of Melbourne’s Bloomberg Data for Health Initiative, a four-year project to improve civil registration and vital statistics in twenty countries. His focus will be on Indonesia, but he will also assist with training and program assessment.

Alexandre Sidorenko

Consultant on Policy and Programs on Aging

Dr. Alexandre Sidorenko is an international consultant on policy and programs on aging, including advisory services and training in Eastern European countries and countries of the former Soviet Union. His current assignments and duties: Member of the Societal Advisory Board of the EC Joint Program Initiative “More years, better lives”; Global Ambassador for HelpAge International (London, United Kingdom); International tutor, International Institute on Aging (UN-Malta); Member, Board of Trustees, World Demographic Association Forum Foundation (St. Gallen, Switzerland); Senior Advisor, European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research (Vienna, Austria). Previously, Alexandre Sidorenko was the Chief of the Population Unit, UN Economic Commission for Europe (2010); and Head of the United Nations Program on Aging (1988-2009). Dr. Sidorenko was born in St. Petersburg, Russia. He received his early education in Ukraine. Dr. Sidorenko pursued graduate studies in medicine, obtaining a Ph.D. in cellular immunology. He was a lecturer at the Kyiv Medical University from 1975 to 1978 and had ten years’ experience in experimental gerontology at the Kyiv Institute of Gerontology, spanning from 1978 to 1988.

Silvia Giorguli

President of El Colegio de México

Silvia Giorguli is the president of El Colegio de México and a faculty member of the Center for Demographic, Urban and Environmental Studies. Her research focuses on international migration from Mexico to the United States and its consequences on education, family formation, and family dynamics in both sides of the border and the transition to adulthood in Mexico and Latin America. She is co-researcher in the Mexican Migration Project. She received a PhD in Sociology from Brown University.

Other Articles

The Demographic Tragedy of Ukraine: A Second Holodomor?

The power of data to enable the future of mobility

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed rifts in intergenerational solidarity (which are driven partly by demographic change)

COVID-19 Data: What are we counting?

Footer

©2021 NoBrainerData. All rights reserved.

Explore

About Us
Blog

Services
Contact Us

Social Media

LinkedIn
Twitter

Facebook
Instagram